Recent Updates Page 3 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • cartesianprogramming 11:33 on 2010/08/26 Permalink | Reply  

    What are the operators available in tlcore? If we are loading up the integer library, we should provide the operations therein, as in the five operators. Is this done?

    Advertisements
     
    • jarro2783 01:29 on 2010/08/27 Permalink | Reply

      I don’t understand the question.
      tlcore has no built in operators, they all come through loading the integer library and declaring things in the header. Are you wanting some of this to be automatic?
      To which five operators are you referring? There are plenty that we could have, all the arithmetic and comparison operators, we could have bitwise operators too. It’s partly a question of how we can implement these with a minimum of typing too.

      • cartesianprogramming 04:08 on 2010/08/27 Permalink | Reply

        I think that there should be a default set of operators. We can always use a flag to turn these on and off. For integers, at the minimum, +, -, *, /, %. For comparison, we have a problem with the angle brackets, we could use ge, gt, le, lt.

    • cartesianprogramming 05:01 on 2010/08/27 Permalink | Reply

      Parsing negative numbers is also problematic if we are not using the intmp interface. I propose that we do the same as in Haskell, and use the tilde (~) to indicate a negative number. That way there will be no confusion between ~3 (negative-three) and -3 (the negation operator applied to three).

    • jarro2783 04:04 on 2010/08/30 Permalink | Reply

      I forgot about the angle brackets. Although only < is a problem. Using tilde is a good idea. I think having a default set of operators is a good idea too. We should come up with a reasonable set of associativities and precedences and allow them to be redefined.

  • cartesianprogramming 11:18 on 2010/08/26 Permalink | Reply  

    Outputtting uuid in tlcore 

    tlcore --uuid
    %%
    x=5;;
    %%
    x;;
    4557f67592cb498fa684d50f5511a65
    intmp<5>

    This is neat, here are a few comments.

    1. The output from the equations section should be separated from the output from the expressions section with a %%.

    2. The uuid “4557f67592cb498fa684d50f5511a65” should read “uuid<4557f67592cb498fa684d50f5511a65>“.

    3. The output from the equations section is not taking into account the –verbose option.

    4. In –verbose mode, we should output equations, demands and expressions as eqn<…>, dem<…> and expr<…>, respectively.

    5. Should there be ;; at the end of each line of output?

    6. Should there be a separator between the input and output? As in a line ?

     
    • jarro2783 11:21 on 2010/08/26 Permalink | Reply

      uuid or uuid … ?
      The rest is easily fixed.

      • cartesianprogramming 11:23 on 2010/08/26 Permalink | Reply

        Problems with angle brackets. Now fixed.

        • jarro2783 11:24 on 2010/08/26 Permalink

          and my reply got broken with the angle brackets too, that doesn’t say what I intended it to.

      • cartesianprogramming 12:01 on 2010/08/26 Permalink | Reply

        The fix looks good. Points 5 and 6 should be tried out. For point 6, that is two dashes on a separate line, to separate the input lines from the output lines. In the reactive mode, there should be two lines with two dashes, before and after each output. If this is too verbose, we can remove it.

  • Blanca Mancilla 06:31 on 2010/08/24 Permalink | Reply  

    Yes, the trick is that SorceForge tl doc pages is not updated automatically with the your updates. Local copies do look better. Can this be done automatically?

     
    • jarro2783 07:27 on 2010/08/24 Permalink | Reply

      I’m not sure how to do this automatically. I can at least make a script that uploads the latest documentation, and then we would need to rebuild it every now and then as we add to the code.

  • Blanca Mancilla 05:52 on 2010/08/24 Permalink | Reply  

    Jarryd, why the “TransLucid Doxygen documentation” doesn’t include all the methods available to a class? Unless I’m missing something, I can’t find the class “Translator” under the class list, only under the “TransLucid Namespace Reference” and there, I can’t find the methods available. Is there a trick?

     
  • cartesianprogramming 06:59 on 2010/08/09 Permalink | Reply  

    The “tlcore with demands” and “reactive tlcore” entries have been updated: The ## has been replaced with $$.

     
  • Jarryd Beck 12:04 on 2010/08/03 Permalink | Reply  

    Current todo list 

    This is the current list of features that are required to work to make tlcore begin to be useful. The important system at the moment is the reactive one.

    • Load libraries in the header
    • define time and pass it in the context
    • add time : #time .. inf to the definition of equations
    • only begin execution after $$
    • bestfit with priority
    • print uuids
    • add a uuid type to allow the manipulation of equations
    • delete and replace
     
  • cartesianprogramming 05:36 on 2010/06/15 Permalink | Reply  

    tlcore with demands 

    When the –demands option is set in tlcore, then it can handle demands. In this case, in each instant, there are four parts, not three. The fourth part is introduced with another %% pair, as follows:

    header
    %%
    equations
    %%
    demands
    %%
    expressions
    $$
    header
    %%
    equations
    %%
    demands
    %%
    expressions
    $$
    ...

    A demand requests that a variable be computed in a specific context. It is written as a pair

    (x,tuple);;

    and it is registered internally by the system with a UUID. At each instant, should the tuple be valid in that instant, then this pair is evaluated, producing the result, along with the other expressions. The response for an instant therefore looks like this:

    dem1demanswer1;;
    ...
    demmdemanswerm ;;
    %%
    answer1;;
    ...
    answern;;

    If the –uuid option is set, then the UUID of the demands is printed out, as it is for equations:

    eqnuuid1;;
    ...
    eqnuuidl;;
    %%
    dem1demuuid1demanswer1;;
    ...
    demmdemuuidmdemanswerm ;;
    %%
    answer1;;
    ...
    answern;;

    Should the –verbose option also be set, then the results will be of the form

    eqn1eqnuuid1;;
    ...
    eqnleqnuuidl;;
    %%
    dem1demuuid1demanswer1;;
    ...
    demmdemuuidmdemanswerm ;;
    %%
    expr1answer1;;
    ...
    exprnanswern;;

     
    • jarro2783 14:00 on 2010/06/20 Permalink | Reply

      Are demands always added to the previous demands? So at any time instant, all the demands from previous instants are evaluated if valid?
      Also where is this context for demands coming from?
      Suppose I write
      (fact, [0:15]);;
      Where does the 0 dimension come from?

      • cartesianprogramming 19:37 on 2010/06/24 Permalink | Reply

        Yes, demands are added to previous demands. But, because there are UUIDs, you can also replace and delete demands, as you can for definitions.

        The 0 dimension just is.

    • yvdriess 13:02 on 2010/06/30 Permalink | Reply

      Could you give a usage example of tlcore? I’ve managed to compile everything, but I cannot seem to get anything out of tlcore.

    • yvdriess 13:43 on 2010/07/07 Permalink | Reply

      Do you have some example input you can pass to tlcore for this? I tried out the repository code, but it isn’t reacting to any input.

    • superspreadsheet 05:47 on 2010/08/24 Permalink | Reply

      Dimension 0 comes from the equations, right? What would happen differently if there were an aether? I’m still looking for the notion of a context in the way TransLucid is running now.

  • cartesianprogramming 04:43 on 2010/06/15 Permalink | Reply  

    Bestfitting with time and priority 

    The simplified bestfitting becomes even simpler in the presence of time and priority. We no longer need deftime nor validtime dimensions. We simply need to use the time dimension. Then definitions might have the form

    x | [time:40..50, priority:2] = E

    There is nothing special about the time dimension as far as bestfitting is concerned. For the priority dimension, this is different, as it is an ordered dimension. We need to adapt the refinement order ⊂ on equations so that the priority is considered first. We can consider an equation q as a quadruple (xq, Pq, Kq, Eq), where Pq is the priority of q. Then

    qq' if xq = xq' and Pq < Pq' or KqKq'

     
  • cartesianprogramming 04:31 on 2010/06/15 Permalink | Reply  

    Bestfitting simplified 

    With the simplification of contexts, bestfitting becomes simpler as well, as does the semantics for identifiers in expressions.

    An equation q is, conceptually, a triple (xq, Kq, Eq), where xq is the variable being defined, Kq is the set of contexts where the equation is valid, and Eq is the defining expression.

    Given two equations q and q’, we write qq’ if xq = xq’ and KqKq’.

    If we have a set of equations σ, then best(σ) consists of the bestfit equations in σ , i.e.,

    best(σ) = {q ∊ σ | ∄ q' ∊ σ. qq'}

    The restriction of a set of equations σ to an identifier x and a context κ is written

    σ|xκ = {q ∊ σ | x = xq and κ ∊ Kq}

    We can now write the semantics for identifiers in equations.

    x⟧σκ =
    let {q1, ..., qn} = best(σ|xκ) in
    let vi = ⟦Eqi⟧σκ in
    v1 ⊕ ⋯ ⊕ vn

    where ⊕ is the combining operator. The simplest combining operator checks that all of its arguments are identical, and returns that value. In the general language, each identifier could have its own combining operator, which could be any commutative, associative operator.

     
  • cartesianprogramming 03:40 on 2010/06/15 Permalink | Reply  

    Contexts simplified 

    In previous work on TransLucid, it was never clear whether a context was a finite or an infinite object. Well, it turns out that by making it an infinite object, then the semantics is a lot cleaner, and bestfitting will become simpler as well. This is the way that it works. Let D be the domain of atomic values. Then a context κ is an element of K = D to D, and a set of contexts K is a subset of K. Then the denotational semantics of TransLucid expressions is much more easily expressed. Here it is, ignoring identifiers and undefined values:


    c⟧σκ = c
    op(E1, ..., En)⟧σκ = op(⟦E1⟧σκ, ..., ⟦En⟧σκ)
    if E1 then E2 else E3⟧σκ = if ⟦E1⟧σκ then ⟦E2⟧σκ else ⟦E3⟧σκ
    #E⟧σκ = κ(⟦E⟧σκ)
    ⟦E11:E12, ..., En1:En2⟧σκ = {⟦E11⟧σκ ⟼ ⟦E12⟧σκ, ..., ⟦En1⟧σκ ⟼ ⟦En2⟧σκ}
    ⟦E2 @ E1⟧σκ = ⟦E2⟧σ(κ † ⟦E1⟧σκ)

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel